Wyoming Game and Fish to suspend its big-game migration corridor designation process until they are more involved at an earlier stage.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Eight state
associations – from county commissioners
to livestock and energy interests –
are asking Wyoming Game and Fish to
suspend its big-game migration corridor
designation process until they are more
involved at an earlier stage.
Wyoming Game and Fish has two
proposed migration corridors in the designation
stage of its process – the Wyoming
Range Mule Deer Corridor and
Sublette Pronghorn Migration Corridor.
Requests
The March 21 letter to Game and Fish
Deputy Director Scott Smith is signed
by the Wyoming County Commissioners
Association, Wyoming Association
of Conservation Districts, Wyoming
Stock Growers Association, Wyoming
Wool Growers Association, Wyoming
Farm Bureau Federation, Wyoming
Mining Association and Petroleum Association
of Wyoming.
“(We) request that the (Game and
Fish) suspend the designation of ungulate
migration corridors until the oil and
gas lease deferral process is clarified and
counties and landowners are involved in
the development of management strategies,”
the letter states.
“… We request (that) the Game and
Fish include local boards of county commissioners
along with affected landowners
early and throughout the process” to
designate corridors, recommend oil and
gas lease sale deferrals and design management
strategies.
It adds, “We believe coordination
and outreach has been lacking throughout
the process to develop a strategy for
conserving ungulate migration corridors,
including the designation of corridors
and recommendations to defer
leases.”
Positions
Sublette County commissioners were
asked for their thoughts on the March 21
letter and each were sent a copy. They
have not yet discussed or taken a stance
on migration corridor proposals.
“I do concur with the points made by
the organizations that signed on to the
letter, including WCCA,” said Commissioner
Joel Bousman. “It is not accurate
to comment that WCCA is protesting
any designations of corridors. The point
of the letter is that communication needs
to occur with all the affected entities involved,
including private landowners
and counties.”
He and commissioners Doug Vickrey
and Mack Rawhouser attended the
February Game and Fish meeting in
Pinedale. After, each commissioner including
chairman David Burnett said.
they needed more information. Commissioner
Tom Noble has not responded.
Bousman again was the only one to
respond to additional questions by press
time.
“I have not spoken to anyone here locally
in Game and Fish since the public
meeting in Pinedale,” Bousman said.
“This is an evolving issue as far as any
restrictions in the corridors and needs to
involve private landowners, the county
and multiple users of the public land.
“I do think that at some point, it would
be good to invite Game and Fish to a commission
meeting to have more specific
discussion. I believe we can do this in a
way that provides for continued multiple
use activities, including energy development,
and still allow for the wildlife to
continue to migrate. We still have a lot to
learn about migration as well. My opinion
only of course.”
Responses
“The Game and Fish Department is not
suspending its migration corridor designation
process but we want to ensure our
stakeholders are being heard so we are
taking the time to evaluate stakeholder
feedback,” said Game and Fish Habitat
Supervisor Angi Bruce. “The Department
will consider all feedback we receive as
we continue the designation process.”
Jim Magagna, executive vice president
of the Wyoming Stock Growers Association,
is another party to the letter, saying
its purpose is not to “protest corridor designations.”
“We, together with others, are requesting
more dialogue on the potential
impacts of more designations before the
G&F takes final action,” Magagna said.
Deputy Chief of Wildlife Doug
Brimeyer further explained in a phone interview
Wednesday that the state agency
would continue its ongoing process to
designate and protect wildlife migration
corridors with more opportunity for public
feedback.
“The Wyoming Range Mule Deer and
Sublette County Pronghorn (migration
corridors) have been through the protocols
we established … since the 1980s,”
he said.
At public meetings in February, including
one in Pinedale, the public was invited
to come for information and provide input
by April 1. Those followed an earlier
get-together in Casper where Game and
Fish announced its proposal to designate
the two migration corridors.
“The community meetings were meant
to open up the conversations,” Brimeyer
said. “We asked people for comments by
April 1 and we are evaluating the ones
we received … to understand stakeholders’
concerns. That’s where we’re at right
now.”
He disagreed that they did not try hard
enough to involve stakeholders in issues
raised now by the statewide government
and interest groups.
“We made an extensive effort to reach
out to stakeholders in February to take
input,” Brimeyer said, adding there is
“room for improvement. We called a number
of parties on that letter to … come to
the meetings.”
The letter also asks Game and Fish to
make sure “private landowners and private
mineral interest owners” have a “full
G&F
Continued from 1A
COUNCIL
Continued from 1A
opportunity” for input.
Brimeyer responded, “We are not trying
to impact landowners in any way. No
way have we meant to impede what people
are doing. We are trying to benefit their
operations. We have gone to bat for these
improvements.”
He noted that cheatgrass and other invasive
weeds are moving along migration
corridors and Game and Fish can help
landowners find federal funds to control
them on their adjacent properties.
In the meantime, Game and Fish is “always
willing” to hear feedback.
Processes
The agency’s Ungulate Migration Corridor
Strategy and policy follow years of
local Game and Fish regional managers
updating wildlife herd maps and talking
to nearby landowners, Brimeyer said.
Designating a migration corridor is
just the first of several steps, he said. The
1980s’ protocol and 2016 policy do not require
approval from the Wyoming Game
and Fish Commission. Instead, wildlife
staff update and inform the Commission
about migration corridors.
The next step is the “risk assessment,
which provides a whole new level of engagement
for the public to be involved,
with more specifics.”
After that, a migration corridor parcel
would be managed on a case-by-case
basis, for example regarding oil and gas
lease sales and multiple use issues.
Sublette stakeholders with questions
can contact Pinedale Region Supervisor
John Lund or habitat supervisor Brandon
Scurlock at the Pinedale office, 432 E.
Mill St. or call 307-367-4352. They can
ask to be added to an email contact list as
parties interested in updates.