The Pinedale Town Council voted at its meeting Monday night to approve the third and final reading of next year’s budget, including the funding of “contracts for services” – most often made up of nonprofit organizations.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
PINEDALE – The Pinedale Town Council voted at its meeting Monday night to approve the third and final reading of next year’s budget, including the funding of “contracts for services” – most often made up of nonprofit organizations.
The council held a special budget meeting on May 11, when most of the town’s $2.3 million operating budget was set in place, but the $100,000 that was budgeted for nonprofits went unallocated as the issue did not get settled.
Monday night, Mayor Bob Jones opened the discussion where he left off May 11, arguing that it’s illegal to give money to nonprofits.
“We’re out of money,” he said Monday night. “And the law is very clear, in my opinion, that we have no business doing this.”
For town attorney Ed Wood, however, it’s doable.
“The state Constitution says public funds shall not be used … except for the support of the poor,” he said, adding that public funds can be used, however, if there’s a demonstrated benefit. “They have to be in a give-and-take situation – benefit for the citizens, benefit for the town.”
On May 11, councilman Matt Murdock argued for focusing on the poor and he echoed that Monday night.
“I come back to – we do it based on the disadvantaged,” he said.
Jones used the example of Big Brothers Big Sisters, which asked for $4,000 this year.
“Can we even support it? I argue we can’t,” he said. “Unless they’re poor people, I don’t see where we have the ability to do it.”
Pinedale resident John Paravicini argued in support of the organizations, insisting they can and should be funded.
“I would contend everything on that list provides, in small or large fashion, a service to the town,” he said.
He further took issue with any legal arguments against funding the organizations.
“Legally, it’s been done. The county does it. Towns all over the state do it,” he said. “it should be an argument of the legalities. It’s, ‘We don’t want to pay this money.’”
“That’s what it boils down to,” Jones replied.
“This stuff shouldn’t be cut because it’s benefiting a lot of people – a lot of people that live in the town,” Paravicini said.
“Is anybody going to sue us (for giving to the nonprofits)? Probably not,” Murdock said. “But we need to be aware we’re skirting an issue here.”
The council ultimately decided not to fund Big Brothers Big Sisters or the Pinedale Soccer Association but did vote to support the other eight organizations that requested funds.
The vote passed, 3-2, with Jones and councilman Jim Brost opposed.
In other news from the meeting:
“We wanted to hurt the least number of people we possibly could,” Jones said.
However, the council did approve a drop in the monthly allotment given to residential customers. Last winter, customers were given a 40,000-gallon allotment. But after the data came back, that number has been dropped to 20,000 gallons.
“We found very few people used the 40,000 gallons and the 20,000 gallons seemed to be a much more reasonable (amount),” Jones said.
To see the full list of changes to water and sewer rates, particularly for those with 2-inch lines and larger, visit townofpinedale.us.
Some also felt that the town’s Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) did not have adequate time to address the changes and make recommendations. What’s more, recommendations that were made did not make it into the proposed ordinance.
“None of those recommendations ended up in the final draft, which is a little disappointing,” said Eatinger, who attends P&Z meetings to stay up to speed on such things and to provide input. “I spent time trying to work through with Planning and Zoning on this but none of that made it into the final draft.”
The council agreed to have a sit down with the town’s two engineering firms and hash out the ordinance’s language before moving forward.
“I’ve talked to some (employees) where they’ve been told they’re not allowed to talk to the town council,” Brost said.
“Talking to them and being directed to do something are two different things,” Jones said.
“So if I’m requesting information,” Brost said.
“Then that goes through me,” Jones said.
Brost further clarified that he doesn’t want any stipulations attached.
“I don’t feel I have to explain myself to you or give you a reason … why I want to get the information,” he said.
“I’ve got no problem with that,” Jones said.
The council voted unanimously to do so “if necessary.”
“The water rights from the BloomField will transfer 100 percent to the town,” he reported.